Top 20 Islamic Websites That Brings You Closer to Jannah

Comments

• thanks for sharing this information with us. I want to read Surah Yaseen Pdf. Please provide with us.

  surah yaseen on March 24, 2022

• Maqdis Quran is a method to learn Arabic through word by word translation.

  GeorgeJErhart on March 23, 2022

• Very useful Post Thanks for sharing

  Areesha Khan on March 07, 2022

• kindly add my site in you website I will be thankful to you

  Areesha Khan on March 07, 2022

• “I HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHANGE, FULFILL AND HEAL HISTORY AND AMERICA FROM DAY #1AND TEAR DOWN EVERY WALL OF THE COURT AND GOVERNMENT OF THE ENEMY TO DECLARE FREEDOM THROUGHOUT THE LAND” SAYS JESUS CHRIST OF ONENESS AND INDIVISIBLE COVENANT OF HIM AND HIS WORD OF ISAIAH 61: 1, EPHESIANS 4: 13 -15, JOHN 17: 21 – 23, JOHN 10: 34 – 35, DEUTERONOMY 6: 4 WITH HIM.. IF YOU SEEK HIM, YOU FIND IT SO.

  IF JESUS CHRIST CAN BELIEVE GOD, SO CAN YOU WHO ARE IN JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF.
  YOU CAN BELIEVE GOD FOR THE IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU, THE NATION AND THE WORLD— MARK 11: 23 -24

  THE RIGHT — YOU CAN MOVE GOD WITH HIS LOVE THAT GETS ALL THINGS POSSIBLE WITH GOD, BECAUSE THERE IS NO LAW BUT THE IMPOSSIBLE WITH HIM. HE SIMPLY WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE FOR IT AND HE WILL DO IT, BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE ONENESS AND INDIVISIBLE COVENANT OF ISAIAH 61: 1, EPHESIANS 4: 13 -15, JOHN 17: 21 – 23, JOHN 10: 34 – 35, DEUTERONOMY 6: 4 WITH HIM.

  PUT HIM TO COVER AND CLEANSE YOUR ROBES AS A NATION IN THE WHITENESS LIGHT OF HIS GLORY. THUS AS A NATION, YOU STAND BEFORE HIM PURE, WALK WITH HIM AS HE WALKS IN LIGHT OF HIS GLORY AS ONE. AS WAS MOSES.

  WHEN GOD ASKS YOU TO BELIEVE IN MARK 11: 23-24, HE IS SAYING WHATEVER, WHATEVER, AND WHATEVER YOU CAN BELIEVE, IT IS ALL POSSIBLE TO GOD, WHO IS THE IMPOSSIBLE IS EVERY SECOND. HAVE THIS MIND OF THE IMPOSSIBLE IS ALWAYS YOURS.

  FAITH OF GOD IS COMMON SENSE WITH GOD.

  THE CHURCH HAS NO FAITH OF GOD, WHICH IS WHY IT HAS NO COMMON SENSE OF GOD TO SPEAK WITH HIM BOLDLY AND HAVE IMPOSSIBLE MIRALCES 60 SECONDS PER MINUTE EVERY DAY.

  WHATEVER IS UNBELIEVABLE WITH GOD IS ALWAYS DO-ABLE IF YOU CAN SIMPLY BELIEVE IT.

  GOD CAN ONLY GIVE YOU WHAT YOU CAN RECEIVE.
  LIKEWISE, HE CANNOT GIVE YOU WHAT YOU CANNOT AND EVEN REFUSE TO RECEIVE. IT IS BECAUSE OF YOUR TRADITIONS OF HOW YOU SEE GOD, DETERMINES IF YOU HAVE IMPOSSIBLE FAITH WITH HIM, OR NO FAITH WHATSOEVER.

  Mark 11:23-24
  23 For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say REGARDING ANYTHING unto this Goliath Mountain — ANYTHING, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and JUST believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.
  24 Therefore I say unto you, What things soever ye desire, when ye pray, believe that ye receive them FROM HIS HAND TO YOUR HAND, and ye shall have them.

  THE FAITH OF GOD IS SIMPLY BELIEVING IT IN THE HEART, SPEAKING IT WITH YOUR MOUTH TO GOD, SO THAT BY COVENANT WITH YOU, HE MAKES IT INTO CREATION AS A NEW EXISTENCE OF WHICH YOU SIMPLY STAND ON NOW FOREVER, AND IT IS ESTABLISHED AS A TREE OF THE EXISTENCE OF GOD NOW IN BOTH HEAVEN AND EARTH. THAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP I HAVE WITH GOD – BASED ON THE ONENESS AND INDIVISIBLE COVENANT OF ISAIAH 61: 1, EPHESIANS 4: 13 -15, JOHN 17: 21 – 23, JOHN 10: 34 – 35, DEUTERONOMY 6: 4 WITH HIM.

  REMEMBER YOU ARE UNLIMITED. HAVE THAT MIND UNLIMITED THAT YOU THAT YOU ARE BELIEVING THE IMPOSSIBLE FOR EVERYONE OF THE NATION BECAUSE YOU ARE OVER THE NATION WITH GOD.

  IT IS POSSIBLE BECAUSE YOU HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BELIEVE THE IMPOSSIBLE THAT GOD CAN ALWAYS DO.

  GOD NEVER ASKS YOU TO PAY FOR IT, BUT SIMPLY BELIEVE FOR IT FROM HIM FROM A KINGDOM THAT NEVER HAS A LIMIT, NOR THINKS THERE IS.

  EVERYTHING GOD ASKS YOU TO DO, IS NEVER YOU DO BY YOURSELF, BUT THE IMPOSSIBLE THAT HE WILL DO, WHEN SIMPLY ASK HIM TO DO THE IMPOSSIBLE.

  ACTS 15:9 And God, who knows the heart, showed His approval by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as He did to us. He made no distinction between us and them, having purified their hearts by faith. Psalm 51:10 Create in me a purified heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me. CLEANSE YOURSELF BY HIS BLOOD. RUB INTO YOURSELVES “HIS ANOINTING” WHICH WILL BREAK ALL YOKES OFF YOU. ISAIAH 10:27.

  READ THIS BOOK: “RED-HANDED: HOW AMERICAN ELITES GET RICH (BILLIONS) HELPING CHINA (AGAINST UNITED STATES)” BY PETER SCHWEIZER

  1 JOHN 2:27 I have written these things to you about those who are trying to deceive you —the democrats,

  As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not a counterfeit lie— So just as he has taught you, remain in fellowship with Christ.

  Proverbs 28:5
  Evil men do not understand justice, but those who seek the LORD comprehend it fully.

  Jeremiah 31:34
  No longer will each man teach his neighbor or his brother, saying, ‘Know the LORD,’ because they will all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the LORD. For I will forgive their iniquities and will remember their sins no more."

  Matthew 13:11
  He replied, "The knowledge of the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.

  set your spirit, heart, mind, soul, and body – as a person and a nation — free with the authority of Jesus Christ WHO IS FREE INDEED on a THRONE of heaven who will give it to you and teach and lead you on how to use his authority of Freedom by speaking it and declaring it AND GOD DOING IT. HE WILL COME THROUGH YOUR DOOR TO VISIT WITH YOU. Declare The testaments of Jesus Christ in the Bible to be the declaration of independence of this country. period. This is historical. Having Authority from God stated in the Testaments of God of the Bible that you have one entire nation, indivisible under God of his kingdom, Liberty, Life, peace, abundance, union, light, Grace, his blessing, his preamble of the Constitution, righteousness, holiness, and sovereignty. amen and amen in Jesus Christ name. It is even recorded there in 1 Peter 2: 9- 10. This is historical. Do You have the guts, courage, and boldness from God on your side to declare and set the nation Free indeed, as one nation, INDIVISIBLE under God of his Abundant freedom, life, light, love, Grace, truth, justice, peace, righteousness, abundance, his blessing, his preamble of the Constitution, sovereignty, and holiness from heaven of his throne for the earth as he intended since the beginning in Genesis. amen and amen. THE COURT MUST GO. THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS A BOARD OF GOVERNORS, BUT THE SUPREME COURT BY THE DICTATORSHIP OF ITSELF HAS NO BOARD OF GOVERNORS. THIS IS AN INVITATION FOR ABSOLUTE TYRANNY AND CORRUPTION.

  SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT IS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ITS SOCIALISM, THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, DRED SCOTT CASE IS ROE V WADE ALIVE AGAIN, THE CONFEDERACY AND SLAVERY AND TRYANNY ALIVE, THE COURTS THEMSELVES AND FREEMAN ON THE LAND MOVERMENT ALIVE AS WELL.

  Many American members of the sovereign citizen movement claim that the United States government is illegitimate and their foreign analogues hold similar beliefs about the government of their own countries. The movement can be traced back to far-right groups like Posse Comitatus and the constitutional militia movement.14 It also includes members of certain self-declared “Moorish” sects.15 While the movement was originally associated with white supremacism and antisemitism, it now includes varying racial ideologies — SUCH AS CRITICAL RACE THEORY -BLACK LIVES MATTER MOVEMENT OR EQUAL RIGHTS - OR FEMINISM OF TAKE YOUR LAWSOFF MY BODY -OR SEPARATE BUT EQUAL - OR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE— as well as a variety of people, most commonly white and African American.

  FREEMAN ON THE LAND MOVEMENT ORIGINATED WITH THE DANBURY BAPTIST CHURCH OF WHICH THOMAS JEFFERSON ADOPTED CLAIMING 1) SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE AND 2) CLAIMING HIMSELF AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OF THIS SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER — BEING THE SAME IDEALS OF THE CONFEDERACY AND THEIR PRACTICE OF SLAVERY AND TYRANNY, WHICH IS THE SAME PRINCIPLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN DRED SCOTT CASE AND ROE V WADE ABORTION CASE WHICH ARE ONE IN THE SAME IDENTICAL, REPRESENTING THE MOTHER AS THE SLAVEOWNER OF THE BABY SAYING THE BABY HAS NO PERSONHOOD, JUST THE SUPREME COURT SAID THAT SLAVES HAD NO PERSONHOOD, AND COULD BE TREATED AS PROPERTY TO BE DISPOSED OF.

  DANTE MICHAEL SOIU

  “I HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHANGE, FULFILL AND HEAL HISTORY AND AMERICA FROM DAY #1AND TEAR DOWN EVERY WALL OF THE COURT AND GOVERNMENT OF THE ENEMY TO DECLARE FREEDOM THROUGHOUT THE LAND” SAYS JESUS CHRIST OF ISAIAH 61: 1, EPHESIANS 4: 13 -15, JOHN 17: 21 – 23, JOHN 10: 34 – 35, DEUTERONOMY 6: 4 WITH HIM.. IF YOU SEEK HIM, YOU FIND IT SO.

  set your spirit, heart, mind, soul, and body – as a person and a nation — free with the authority of Jesus Christ WHO IS FREE INDEED on a THRONE of heaven who will give it to you and teach and lead you on how to use his authority of Freedom by speaking it and declaring it AND GOD DOING IT. HE WILL COME THROUGH YOUR DOOR TO VISIT WITH YOU.

  Declare the testaments of Jesus Christ in the Bible to be the declaration of independence of this country. period. This is historical.

  Having authority from God stated in the Testaments of God of the Bible that you have one entire nation, indivisible under God of his kingdom, Liberty, Life, peace, abundance, union, light, Grace, his blessing, his preamble of the Constitution, righteousness, holiness, and sovereignty. amen and amen in Jesus Christ himself name. It is even recorded there in 1 Peter 2: 9- 10. This is historical.

  Do you have the guts, courage, and boldness from God on your side to declare it and set the nation Free indeed, as one nation, INDIVISIBLE under God of his Abundant freedom, life, light, love, Grace, truth, justice, peace, righteousness, abundance, his blessing, his preamble of the Constitution, sovereignty, and holiness from heaven of his throne for the earth as he intended since the beginning in Genesis. amen and amen. DANTE MICHAEL SOIU

  ASK THE LORD THAT YOU MAY KNOW HIM AND HIS SPIRIT AS ONE (DEUTERONOMY 6: 4) OF FREEDOM, JUSTICE, LIFE, LIGHT, TRUTH, PEACE, GRACE, ABUNDANCE, sovereignty, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND HOLINESS AS ONE KINGDOM ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN AND INDIVISIBLE UNDER GOD – MORE THAN YOU CAN ASK, THINK OR COUNT BECAUSE THE DOOR IS OPENED WIDE.

  JESUS CHRIST DAMNS THE COURT FOR NOT ACKNOWLEDGING HIM AS SUPREME AUTHORITY, FROM CREATION TO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS AND TO THE RESURRECTION. THE COURT MUST GO. THE FEDERAL RESERVE HAS A BOARD OF GOVERNORS, BUT THE SUPREME COURT BY THE DICTATORSHIP OF ITSELF HAS NO BOARD OF GOVERNORS. THIS IS AN INVITATION FOR ABSOLUTE TYRANNY AND CORRUPTION.

  WHO MAKES THE COURT’S DECISIONS BUT BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY.
  BUT BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY DID NOT FULFILL ISAIAH 61: 1, SO IT DOES NOT COUNT ANYMORE. PERIOD.

  HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY BY THE JUSTICES IN ACTION:
  Judges, like the rest of us, turn to dictionaries when they’re not sure about the meaning of a word. Or they turn to dictionaries when they’re sure about a word’s meaning, but they need some confirmation. Or they turn to a dictionary that defines a word the way they want it defined, rejecting as irrelevant, inadmissible, and immaterial any definitions they don’t like.
  The Supreme Court has referred to dictionaries in its opinions over 664 times. In recent years, almost every major case and many minor ones find the justices, or their clerks, thumbing through Webster’s Third or the Oxford English Dictionary. And it’s not just high-profile cases like District of Columbia v. Heller, the one about the Second Amendment, where definitions of words like militia and bear arms came into play. While he was writing an opinion in a patent case, Chief Justice John Roberts looked up words in five different dictionaries. When was the last time you looked up a word in more than one dictionary?
  Sometimes even five dictionaries aren’t enough. In Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan (2012), Justice Samuel Alito checked ten dictionaries to prove that the word interpreter refers to someone who translates speech, not writing, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg found four dictionaries supporting her view that interpreter can refer to a translator of documents as well. Complicating things even more, both justices relied on the same definitions of interpreter in Webster’s Third and Black’s Law Dictionary to support their opposing claims. It turns out that dictionary definitions need interpreting, just as the law does.
  Why all this consulting of dictionaries by the courts? When a word is not defined in a statute, legal convention says that we’re supposed to give that word its ordinary, customary, or plain meaning. But the ‘ordinary meaning’ of words is often in dispute: the recent case of Bullock v. BankChampaign (2013) turned on the meaning of defalcation, an obscure accounting term that has no plain meaning. But the meaning of more common words is often also up for grabs. That’s why as many as 15 or 16 million civil lawsuits are filed every year, all of them based on conflicting interpretations of the words in our laws and contracts.
  DEFINITION OF HUMAN, PERSON, SOVEREIGN CITIZEN, FEDERAL CITIZEN, ACCORDING TO BLACK’S LAW:

  A man considered according to the rank he holds in whatever society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. … A human being is considered as capable of having rights (NOT FROM GOD, BUT FROM THE COURT) and of being charged with duties; while a “thing” is the object over which rights may be exercised.
  According to legal terminology, legal personhood is not exactly synonymous with human beings. The law divides the world between two entities: things and persons. … So, a “non-human person” refers to an entity that is guaranteed some rights for limited legal purposes.

  Human being (ACCORDING TO THE COURT) means an individual living member of the species of homo sapiens, including the unborn human being during the entire embryonic and fetal ages from fertilization to full gestation. … Human being (ACCORDING TO THE COURT) means a person who has been born and was alive at the time of the criminal act.”) BEING BORN ACCORDING TO THE COURT IS A CRIMINAL ACT; State v.

  It is common to assume “person” and “human being” mean the same thing, but from what has been described above, this may not be true and in fact most philosophers distinguish between these two types of entity. “Human being” is an animal designation for those of the species Homo sapiens (or related).

  WHEN THE COURTS GO, FOR THEIR AUTHORITY IS QUICKSAND, THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FOLD ITS TENT FOREVER TO THE PATRIOT OF AMERICA.

  THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER STILL IS SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT, THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ITS SOCIALISM, THE DRED SCOTT CASE ALIVE, ROE V WADE ALIVE, THE CONFEDERACY IS SLAVERY AND TYRANNY ALIVE, THE COURTS THEMSELVES AND THE FREEMAN ON THE LAND MOVEMENT ALIVE. STOP BIDEN’S NOMINEE

  TO FR. FRANK PAVONE OF PRIESTS FOR LIFE.
  HAVE THE ENTIRE CATHOLIC CHURCH RALLY BEHIND YOU AND TAKE YOUR BOLD LEAD, CREATE A NEW MINISTRY CALLED “PRIESTS FOR ONE NATION, INDIVISIBLE, UNDER ISAIAH 61:1 FOR HIS FREEDOM, LIFE, LIGHT, PEACE, ABUNDANCE, HAPPINESS, BLESSINGS, GRACE, JUSTICE, RIGHTEOUSNESS AND HOLINESS FOR ALL.” THIS IS A BIG FLAG TO BE UNDER, AND ALL CATHOLICS AND NON-CATHOLICS WILL JOIN AS YOU ARE GENERAL SHERIDAN AS YOU MARCH TO THE SEA AND WIPE OUT ALL YOUR ENEMIES — AND GATHER BILLIONS IN DONATIONS. DANTE MICHAEL SOIU — GOD BLESS YOU GREATLY FROM HIM WHO SITS UPON THE THRONE OF HEAVEN ITSELF AND IS AMONG THE CHERUBIM AND SERAPHIM.

  SPEAK THE MIND UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF GOD THAT SITS ON A THRONE IN HEAVEN THAT WROTE THE BOOKS OF EPHESIANS AND PHILIPPIANS AND JAMES AND THE GOSPEL OF JOHN — SPEAK THESE BOOKS AND ITS MIND TO GOD AND THUS MAKE COVENANT WITH GOD AS ONE – FOR THIS IS THE MIND OF AUTHORITY OF THE ROMAN CENTURION WHO UNDERSTOOD AUTHORITY AND WALKED IN IT AND THUS SAID TO JESUS CHRIST “DON’T COME TO MY HOUSE, BUT SPEAK ONLY YOUR WORD OF AUTHORITY FOR YOU AND IT ARE ONE, AND MY SERVANT (EVEN THE NATION) SHALL BE HEALED FROM TOP TO BOTTOM.
  THE MIND THAT IS NOT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF GOD, IS THE MIND OF REBELS, THE OUTLAWS AND DISOBEDIENT AS THE DEMOCRATS, JESUS CHRIST IS GOING TO CURSE. I AND GOD ARE DOING IT AS ONE

  SOVEREIGN CITIZEN MOVEMENT IS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ITS SOCIALISM, THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, DRED SCOTT ALIVE, ROE V WADE ALIVE, THE CONFEDERACY AND SLAVERY AND TRYANNY ALIVE, THE COURTS THEMSELVES AND FREEMAN ON THE LAND MOVERMENT ALIVE AS WELL.
  Many American members of the sovereign citizen movement claim that the United Stamovtes government is illegitimate13 and their foreign analogues hold similar beliefs about the government of their own countries. The movement can be traced back to far-right groups like Posse Comitatus and the constitutional militia movement.14 It also includes members of certain self-declared “Moorish” sects.15 While the movement was originally associated with white supremacism and antisemitism, it now includes varying racial ideologies — SUCH AS CRITICAL RACE THEORY — BLACKLIVES MATTER MOVMOVEMENT OR EQUAL RIGHTS — OR FEMINISM OF TAKE YOUR LAWS OFF MY BODY -OR SEPARATE BUT EQUAL - OR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE — as well as a variety of people, most commonly white and African American.12

  Detaxer ideology was further adapted by the freeman on the land movement,13 which became more prevalent than sovereign citizens in Commonwealth countries.1415 In the United States and Canada, pseudolaw has been used by Indigenous groups (BLACK LIVES MATTER MARXIST MOVEMENT AND CRITICAL RACE THEORY) as well as by those claiming inauthentic indigenous identities,16 and by other ethnic groupings such as the African-American “Moorish” sovereign citizens.17
  FREEMAN ON THE LAND MOVEMENT ORIGINATED WITH THE DANSBURY BAPTIST CHURCH OF WWHICH THOMAS JEFFERSON ADOPTED CLAIMING 1) SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE AND 2) HIMSELF AS A SOVEREIGN CITIZEN OF THE SOVEREIGN CITIZENS MOVEMENT OF THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER — BEING THE SAME IDEALS OF THE CONFEDERACY AND THEIR PRACTICE OF SLAVERY AND TYRANNY.

  The freeman-on-the-land movement, also known as the freemen-of-the-land (sometimes abbreviated as FOTL2 ), the freemen movement, or simply freemen, is a loose group of individuals who believe that they are bound by statute laws only if they consent to those laws. They believe that they can therefore declare themselves independent of the government and the rule of law, holding that the only “true” law is their own idiosyncratic interpretation of “common law”.3
  This doctrine, known as the “wall of separation” or “strict separationist,” would later become highly influential in 20th century Supreme Court understandings of the relationship between church and state. The phrase “separation of church and state” does not appear in the United States Constitution, despite its wide use and origin from a founding father — THOMAS JEFFERSON — WHO WAS AN ASS OF UNDER NO AUTHORITY OF GOD IN HEAVEN WHATSOEVER BUT CONTINUED DOING HIS OWN THING WITHOUT GOD 100% NOT EVER ACCEPTING ONE NATION, INDIVISIBLE UNDER GOD WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. The relevance of this reply is a subject of heated debate, with scholars such as Robert Boston emphasizing its importance, and others such as Mark David Hall arguing that the letter was a historical outlier.78

  However, many Baptists in the United States still believe in the wall of separation and support maintaining it. For example, fifteen Baptist organizations, representing collectively over ten million Baptists in America, collaborate with one another to protect religious liberty and the separation of church and state through their funding of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.11 Freedom of conscience is a historic Baptist distinctive, and many Baptists continue to believe the best course for obtaining and securing freedom of conscience through the separation of church and state — AND NOT THE UNION OF GOD AND MAN IN JESUS CHRIST WHATSOEVER. SO SPEAK AS THE ROMAN CENTURION WHO HAD THE GREATEST FAITH OF A WHOLE NATION.212

  IF JESUS CHRIST IS COMING BACK INSIDE HIS PEOPLE FOR A REBIRTH OF FREEDOM OF ONE NATION INDIVISIBLE UNDER ISAIAH 61: 1 UNDER GOD WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL – FOR RELIGION THAT IS AGAINST THIS, HE IS GOING TO DESTROY THIS RELIGION OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH.

  The sovereign citizen movement — THE SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER — BEING THE SAME IDEALS OF THE CONFEDERACY AND THEIR PRACTICE OF SLAVERY AND TYRANNY — BEING A BAPTIST DOCTRINE - is one of the main contemporary sources of pseudolaw.11 Most schemes promoted by the movement involve means to avoid taxes, ignore laws, eliminate debts or extract money from the government -- BEING THE WHOLE BASIS OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FROM BLACK LIVES MATTER MARXISM TO FEMINISTS ABORTION MARXISM OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THE CONFEDERACY.12

  Pseudolaw consists of statements, beliefs, or practices that are claimed to be based on accepted law or legal doctrine, but which deviate significantly from most conventional understandings of law and jurisprudence, or which originate from non-existent statutes or legal principles the advocate or adherent incorrectly believes exist.1
  Canadian legal scholar Donald J. Netolitzky defined pseudolaw as “a collection of legal-sounding but false rules that purport to be law”,2 a definition that distinguishes pseudolaw from arguments that fail to conform to existing laws such as novel arguments or an ignorance of precedent in case law.34 The features are distinct and conserved.3 Pseudolaw often purports to base itself on “common law”.2 Pseudolegal arguments are sometimes referred to as “legalistic gibberish”.5 The more extreme examples of pseudolegal tactics have been classified as paper terrorism.6

  Litigants who use pseudolaw generally dispense with real legal counsel. They frequently rely on techniques and arguments promoted and sold – sometimes as “kits” – by amateur legal theorists, who are commonly called “gurus”.26 Pseudolegal theories and schemes are disseminated and advertised through websites, isolated documents, short or voluminous texts, seminars, radio broadcasts, instructional DVDs and, above all, YouTube videos.26 Pseudolaw gurus may occasionally appear in court, though in most cases their followers are left to represent themselves.67 People offering false and unlicensed legal services are likely to be charlatans or scammers.48

  Pseudolaw has notably been used to challenge certain laws, taxes and sentences, escape debt, avoid foreclosure, as part of financial schemes, but also to deny the jurisdiction of courts or even the legitimacy of governments. It is a common tactic of tax protesters and conspiracy theorists, as well as some types of vexatious litigants. Pseudolegal tactics may defy rationality and resemble magic rituals more than actual law.9 The behavior of litigants who use such methods is sometimes so unorthodox it resembles mental illness.310 Arguments derived from pseudolaw have never been accepted in court.2
  In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) estimated that approximately 100,000 Americans were “hard-core sovereign believers”, with another 200,000 “just starting out by testing sovereign techniques for resisting everything from speeding tickets to drug charges”.16

  ACCORDING TO THE COURTS OF BLACKSTONE:
  Sovereignty is a political concept that refers to dominant power or supreme authority. In a monarchy, supreme power resides in the “sovereign”, or king. … Sovereignty is essentially the power to make laws, even as Blackstone defined it.
  Sovereignty is the supreme authority within a territory. … In any state, sovereignty is assigned to the person, body, or institution that has the ultimate authority over other people in order to establish a law or change an existing law.
  1a : supreme power especially over body politics. b : freedom from external control of anyone : autonomy. c : controlling influence.

  A Democracy is defined as a type of government where the power to govern rests with a country’s people rather than a ruling family or a single individual. … In a republic, the people elect representatives to make the laws and an executive to enforce those laws. THERE IS NO UNION OF THE TWO. IF THERE WERE THE UNION OF THE TWO, ROE V WADE WOULD NOT EXIST.

  Federal sovereign immunity. In the United States, the federal government has sovereign immunity and may not be sued unless it has waived its immunity or consented to suit. … The United States Supreme Court in Price v. United States observed: "It is an axiom of our jurisprudence. How do I become sovereign? This involves removing one’s self from federal jurisdiction and relinquishing any evidence of consent to THE COURT’S U.S. citizenship, such as a Social Security number, driver’s license, car registration, use of ZIP Codes, marriage license, voter registration, and birth certificate.

  THE PRINCIPLE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE SUPREME COURT MUST BE CAST DOWN AS IT IS, FOR IT IS AN ABSOLUTE TYRANNY HAVING SET UP AUTHORITY BY ITSELF TO ITSELF AND FOR ITSELF – ANSWERABLE TO NO ONE EVEN IF YOU HAVE A TRILLION PEOPLE MARCH – THEY COULD CARE LESS. THEREFORE IT MUST COME DOWN UNDER OUR FOOT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND SOVEREIGNTY – ALL OF WHICH THE SUPREME COURT DENIES TO THIS DAY. THE SUPREME COURT IS THE COURTS OF THE KING OF ENGLAND – PASSED DOWN AND WE KNOW IT.

  The Supreme Court did not sign and will never sign or admit the declaration of independence.
  it doesn’t make any decisions on the declaration of independence
  it doesn’t accept any rights from God to you nor you having sovereignty as a citizen.
  it doesn’t accept, admit, or make decisions on the pledge of allegiance
  it doesn’t accept the flag nor sovereignty of God himself, nor the United States of America.
  it has caused the civil war and all chaos and social war and socialism in the country.
  it doesn’t nor ever accept nor quote the bible nor Jesus Christ at all.
  to them you are a slave and they are king of England. they quote the magna Carta, but not the declaration of independence, the ten commandments, nor anything that you think is true.
  life, liberty and pursuit of happiness and statue of liberty, and mount Rushmore and you are a zero to them.
  they deny the preamble of the constitution
  therefore, you have to join republican party and claim your rights of authority under God himself and deny them any authority whatsoever for have no true authority. and you have it all.

  the supreme court was not going to set the slaves free in as much as it is not going to set the citizens free as well or declare that citizens have rights under God, whom they reject both

  WHAT IS A “PERSON” ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF BLACK’S LAW AND BLACK’S CONSTITUTION?
  In the imaginary world of legal fiction – and all commerce is legal fiction, a “person” is always an artificial “legal person” of one kind or another legally generated.

  “A legal person is any subject matter to which the law attributes a merely legal or fictitious personality. This extension … is one of the most noteworthy feats of the legal imagination .. (!) Legal persons, being the arbitrary creations of the law, may be of as many kinds as the law pleases. Those … recognized by our own system, however, all fall within a single class, namely, corporations or corporate bodies.”
  Source: Jurisprudence 7th Edition, Sweet & Maxwell Ltd (1924), Section 113, p.336.

  natural person. A human being, naturally born, versus a legally generated juridical person.
  Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition
  http://thelawdictionary.org/natural-person/"

  artificial person. A nonhuman entity that is created by law and is legally different owning its own rights and duties.
  Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition
  http://thelawdictionary.org/artificial-person/"

  juridical person. Entity, as a firm, that is not a single natural person, as a human being, authorized by law with duties and rights, recognised as a legal authority having a distinct identity, a legal personality. Also known as artificial person, juridical entity, juristic person, or legal person. Also refer to body corporate.
  Black’s Law Dictionary, 2nd Edition
  http://thelawdictionary.org/juridical-person/

  natural person. A human being, as distinguished from an artificial person created by law.
  Blacks Law Dictionary, 7th Edition
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD8ISiJfgW4

  “Person” means … an individual, a firm, a partnership, an association, a fiduciary, an executor or administrator, a governmental entity, a limited liability company, or a corporation.
  Indiana Code, Title 9, Motor Vehicles, Article 13, General Provisions and Definitions, Chapter 2, Definitions IC 9-13-2-124, Person, Section 124 Subsection a.

  Individual. As a noun, this term denotes … a … natural person … and … may, in proper cases, include artificial persons.
  Black’s Law Dictionary 773, 6th Edition. 1990. U.S. v. Middleton. No 99-10518, 231 F.3d 1207 (9th Cir. 2000).

  The term “person” does not include the sovereign.
  Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U.S. 653 (1979)

  On the Birth Certificate, the legal person NAME is a deceased Estate Trust, which is why the definition for the term “person” in the United States.Inc Social Security Act 1935, includes “trust or estate”. Social Security Act 1935 DEFINITIONS SECTION 1101. “(a) When used in this Act- (3) The term person means an individual, a trust or estate, a partnership, or a corporation.”
  https://www.ssa.gov/history/35act.html

  The existence of two entities, the “legal person” and the “natural person” (the terms that may differentiate between nonhuman and human entities) is plainly acknowledged in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, section 29, Application to Legal Persons. “Except where the provisions of this Bill of Rights otherwise provide, the provisions of this Bill of Rights apply, so far as practicable, for the benefit of all legal persons as well as for the benefit of all natural persons.”
  http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1990/0109/latest/DLM224792.html

  All legally generated fictional “persons” are debtors by default, because they are created without any inherent productive capacity. Their inferior status is indicated by the use of written styles other than proper English grammar, and/or by “joining” the “family name/surname/last name” which is not part of a man/woman’s appellation “Given name” Estate Title, and legally dead, having no autonomous life.

  Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides the following definitions of written styles:

  The Nonhuman Rights Project’s habeas corpus litigation forces courts to confront and determine whether our nonhuman animal clients are legal persons, as opposed to mere legal things. This distinction has profound significance. Legal persons may possess fundamental legal rights, including the right to bodily liberty; legal things, on the other hand, have no rights at all. In addition to presenting courts with centuries of legal precedent in support of our personhood arguments, we also present hundreds of pages of uncontroverted and robust scientific evidence showing that chimpanzees and elephants are autonomous beings.
  The NhRP’s first case was on behalf of Tommy, a chimpanzee imprisoned alone in a cage on a used trailer lot in Gloversville, New York. In December of 2014, a New York intermediate appellate court confronted the issue of Tommy’s legal personhood, and ruled that he is not, and could not be, a legal person. That unprecedented decision, People ex rel. Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. Lavery (“Lavery”), was profoundly wrong then and remains so today.

  As discussed in this post, nearly five years after Lavery, a crucial error at the heart of the court’s opinion—discovered in 2017 by the NhRP legal team—has finally been corrected. Future courts should find it completely untenable to follow in its footsteps.

  The “rights and duties” error
  In Lavery, the Third Judicial Department ruled that to be a legal person, an individual must be capable of bearing, not merely legal rights, but both legal rights and legal duties. And the court believed it obvious that no chimpanzees are capable of bearing legal duties. The court concluded:
  In our view, it is this incapability to bear any legal responsibilities and societal duties that renders it inappropriate to confer upon chimpanzees the legal rights—such as the fundamental right to liberty protected by the writ of habeas corpus—that have been afforded to human beings.

  Lavery marks the first time in Anglo-American history that a court denied a legal right to an individual for lacking the capacity to bear legal duties. Yet many individuals who are incapable of bearing legal duties are unquestionably legal persons. Indeed, last year in a concurring opinion issued by New York’s highest court, Judge Eugene Fahey criticized Lavery on this very ground:

  Even if it is correct, however, that nonhuman animals cannot bear duties, the same is true of human infants or comatose human adults, yet no one would suppose that it is improper to seek a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of one’s infant child . . . or a parent suffering from dementia. In short, being a “moral agent” who can freely choose to act as morality requires is not a necessary condition of being a “moral patient” who can be wronged and may have the right to redress wrongs.

  Where, then, did Lavery get its strange notion that legal personhood requires the capacity for legal duties? Most significantly, the court relied on the eminent legal treatise Jurisprudence, originally authored by Sir John William Salmond, who was an accomplished lawyer and a judge on the Supreme Court of New Zealand. The court did not cite the treatise directly, but instead another source in which Jurisprudence appears: Black’s Law Dictionary, the most widely cited legal text in the world.

  Lavery quoted the following sentence from Jurisprudence as it appears in the 7th edition of Black’s Law Dictionary: “So far as legal theory is concerned, a person is any being whom the law regards as capable of rights and duties.”
  But in 2017, the NhRP discovered that the quoted sentence from Jurisprudence—as it actually appears in the treatise—contains a key difference compared to the version that ended up in Lavery. Jurisprudence actually says: “So far as legal theory is concerned, a person is any being whom the law regards as capable of rights or duties.” “Rights or duties”—not, as in Black’s Law Dictionary, “rights and duties.”

  This misquotation is not some trivial mistake, but a fundamental error at the heart of the court’s decision. In the very next sentence of Jurisprudence, the treatise makes clear that “[a]ny being that is so capable [of rights or duties] is a person, whether a human being or not,” which is the complete opposite of what Lavery said about legal personhood. It’s also precisely what the NhRP has maintained all along.

  Correcting the error
  Discovering the error was one thing, but getting it corrected was another. Although Lavery relied on the 7th edition of Black’s Law Dictionary, which was published in 1999, subsequent editions of the legal dictionary also contain the same misquotation of Jurisprudence. Black’s Law Dictionary was in its 10th edition when the error was discovered in 2017, having been published in 2014.

  Shortly after the error’s discovery, the NhRP sent Bryan Garner, Esq., the editor-in-chief of Black’s Law Dictionary, a letter urging him to correct it so that the “erroneous definition may not be cited by courts in the future.” To his credit, Mr. Garner promptly responded and said that he would, though did not indicate when the next edition would be released.

  Now, after more than two years of waiting, and nearly five years since the Lavery decision, the NhRP is pleased to report that the 11th edition of Black’s Law Dictionary has finally been published—with the decades-old error officially corrected. Quoting Jurisprudence, Black’s Law Dictionary correctly reads: “So far as legal theory is concerned, a person is any being whom the law regards as capable of rights or duties.”

  Going forward
  The wrongness of Lavery has only become clearer over time and thus even more legally indefensible. Going forward, Black’s Law Dictionary will no longer be the impediment it has been in the fight to secure fundamental legal rights for nonhuman animals. Instead, in future court filings, we expect it to become a powerful asset that cannot be ignored.

  I AM ASKING AND GOD IS ASKING EVERY CHRISTIAN, JEWISH AND MUSLIM TO GO TO THE DEMOCRATS IN WASHINGTON DC AND IN ALL CITIES AND STATES IN ALL BRANCHES, AND TO EVERY JUSTICE AND BRING THEM TO THE ALTAR OF GOD, GET ON THEIR KNEES AND REPENT TOWARDS GOD ON A THRONE IN ALL HEAVEN AND EARTH AND NOT MOVE FROM THAT POSITION.

  FOR THE AX IS BEING LAID TO THE ROOT OF THEIR TREE FOREVER BY JESUS CHRIST HIMSELF. AMEN AND AMEN.

  THIS COUNTRY – ESPECIALLY THE DEMOCRATS IN ALL 3 BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT - NEVER NEEDS EQUALITY, DOES NOT A CONSCIENCE, DOES NOT NEED A CHOICE -- WHAT IT NEEDS AS THE ONLY MEDICINE IS FAITH AND FREEDOM IN GOD BY THE TONS FULL. THEY NEED TO COME TO THE ALTAR OF GOD, GET ON ITS KNEES AND REPENT AND NOT MOVE FROM THAT POSITION BEFORE GOD ON A THRONE IN ALL HEAVEN AND EARTH. AMEN.

  THIS NEEDS EVER-INCREASING FAITH AND FREEDOM IN GOD FROM TOP TO BOTTOM — IN THE SCHOOLS AND EVERYWHERE
  I AM GOING TO SHOW YOU WHERE YOU CAN GET IT AND WHO TEACHES IT ABUNDANTLY
  HERE IS SUPPORTING EVIDENCE FOR YOU, THE NATION AND THE WORLD TO BE ON TOP FOREVER. DANTE MICHAEL SOIU

  YES, I AM ALWAYS PRAYING TO GOD TO GIVE ME GREAT THINGS TO GIVE YOU MORE FREEDOM, JUSTICE, LIFE, LIGHT, TRUTH, LOVE, ABUNDANCE OUT OF THESE WORDS YOU SPEAK TO GOD. WHEN YOU SPEAK THEM, HE WILL DO THEM. JUST THAT SIMPLE

  HERE IS WORD OF FREEDOM PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN HEALED OF TERMINAL DISEASES, HEALED OTHERS OF TERMINAL DISEASES – EVEN THE DISEASE OF A WHOLE NATION OF UNBELIEF OR NO KNOWLEDGE OF FAITH AND FREEDOM IN GOD AND HOW IT WORKS AS A LAW TO GOD LIKE GRAVITY – BECAUSE IT IS THE COVENANT OF GOD HIMSELF THAT DOES IT ALL. GIVING MONEY DOES NOT PRODUCE FAITH IN GOD. YOU CANNOT BUY THE FAITH AND FREEDOM IN GOD OF GOD IN JESUS CHRIST THAT RAISES ALL THINGS FROM THE DEAD THAT SITS ON A THRONE, THAT SPEAKS THINGS INTO EXISTENCE AS THOUGH THEY WERE – BECAUSE YOU ARE IN A SPIRIT, MIND, SOUL, HEART, BODY UNION WITH HIM AS ONE COVENANT – THE ABRAHAM OF JESUS CHRIST, THE MOSES OF JESUS CHRIST, THE JOSHUA OF JESUS CHRIST, THE DAVID OF JESUS CHRIST. THE MIRACLES THAT THEY SPOKE IN GOD ARE RECORDED IN HEBREWS 11. THE PRODUCTION OF ALL MIRACLES ARE FOUND IN BOOKS OF EPHESIANS, PHILIPPIANS, GOSPEL OF JOHN ETC – YOU SPEAK THEM TO GOD. QUIT READING IT AND STARTING SPEAKING IT ENTIRELY TO GOD.

  AMEN AND AMEN.
  THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU GREATLY.

  Dante Michael Soiu, On Mount Sinai with God Who is A Capitalist of Free Enterprise called The Kingdom of God of Unending Wealth to bring into Your Experience when you Covenant with Him in Heaven as a King that can change all things when you tap inside Himself for You being the Samaritan Woman to give her a tsunami that never runs dry of all things.
  5750 Pine Tree Street West Apt G Columbus Ohio 43229
  380-206-4093 – easymiracles3@gmail.com and championsbutton@gmail.com

  A NATIONAL MONETARY APPRECIATION GIFT OF VALUE, AND ALWAYS A NEW JOB, AND ALWAYS WELCOMED BY MAIL OR WELCOME BY THE “ZELLE BANKING SYSTEM” AND NATIONAL NOBEL PEACE PRIZE ALSO WELCOMED

  SEND ALL APPRECIATION TO MY EMAIL OF EASYMIRACLES3@GMAIL.COM TO CHASE BANK THROUGH THE ZELLE SYSTEM OF ALL BANKS. THANK YOU.

  THE GREAT PUSH IS ON TO CHANGE HISTORY. YOU CONQUER ALL THINGS AS “YOU AND GOD ARE ONE WITH HIS AUTHORITY FROM HEAVEN THAT SITS ON A THRONE OF IMMENSE COURAGE, BOLDNESS AND BOUNDLESS EVER-INCREASING FAITH.” YOU ARE REMEMBERED BY WHAT YOU HAVE CONQUERED IN HIS NAME OF THE COVENANT OF GOD THAT YOU WALK WITH HIM IN CONSTANT VICTORY.

  THE GREAT PUSH IS ON TO CHANGE HISTORY.
  YOU CONQUER ALL THINGS AS “YOU, A CAPITALIST, AND GOD, A CAPITALIST, ARE AS ONE IN HIS AUTHORITY OF COVENANT FROM HEAVEN BEING CAPITALIST AND NOT EVER SOCIALIST.” ONE NATION UNDER FREE ENTERPRISE WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THAT SHOULD BE PLACED THIS INTO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MAKE THE SOCIALISTS BE FORCED TO EAT IT AND LEAVE ENTIRELY BECAUSE THEY CANNOT PROFIT FROM STOPPING FREE ENTERPRISE AGAIN AND POCKETING THE MONEY WITHOUT AUDITORS LOOKING AT THEM AT ALL.

  DANTE MICHAEL SOIU on January 31, 2022

• bahareshariat

  Dilshad Shaikh on January 02, 2022

• localmuslimmarriagecounselor.com

  Sister Haleema on January 01, 2022

• ]

  ThomasAnerm on October 01, 2021

• [url=https://letmebel.ru/katalog/mebel-na-zakaz/]мебель под заказ[/url]

  Richardtrept on October 01, 2021

• ]

  JacobFuell on October 01, 2021